There is no sufficient remedy for a life taken by somebody's mistake. What is available is an answer about what happened, and a recovery that stops the loss from also becoming a financial collapse.
Indiana's wrongful death statute recognises that people who depended on somebody - financially, or for care and companionship - are harmed too. The wrongful act might be negligence, such as careless driving. It might be reckless. It might be deliberate. The firm's stated view is that holding negligent people responsible is also part of how some of these deaths stop happening to the next family.
01
Auto, trucking, motorcycle, bus, bicycle and pedestrian accidents. Boating, railroad crossing and airplane accidents. Unsafe construction sites and workplace accidents. Premises liability and negligent security. Toxic exposure. Animal attacks. Drowning and fires. Prescription drug fatalities, and dangerous or defective products.
02
Indiana law defines who may file. A spouse and children may. Parents may, where they have lost a minor child or where they depended on an adult child for financial support. Grandparents and other relatives may, depending on circumstances. A personal representative files on behalf of surviving family members. Indiana restricts filings in which one family member would sue another over the death of a third.
03
General adult claims, where an adult with dependents dies and the family may seek medical expenses, funeral costs, lost earnings and the loss of love and companionship. Child claims, which in most cases must be filed by the parents rather than a personal representative, and which can include counselling for grieving parents and the value of a child's uninsured debts. And claims for an unmarried adult without dependents, where the estate may recover economic losses and non-dependent family may seek loss of love and companionship - usually without future earnings.
04
Non-dependent parents and adult children of the deceased may seek damages for loss of companionship, and the state caps those damages at a maximum of $300,000. It is a stated statutory limit rather than an estimate of anybody's case, which is why it appears on this page when other figures deliberately do not.
05
Investigates the death fully, establishes who is at fault, assesses the real extent of the loss, and pursues a recovery that helps the survivors rebuild. Where a recovery needs to be structured or held in trust to serve people for years, that gets arranged rather than left to sort itself out.
The same order every time, because most of the costly mistakes in injury work come from doing step four before step two.
A phone call, in your own words, in whatever order it comes out. You do not need the police report in front of you and you do not need to have it organised. If the answer is that you probably do not need a lawyer, you get told that on the first call, and it still costs nothing.
The firm's published standard is that you should only hire it if it can put you in a better position than you would be in on your own. That is why the first conversation is a conversation rather than a sales call, and why some of them end with a recommendation to do nothing.
Records, bills, wage information, photographs, witness accounts, and whatever the other side has already put in writing. Meanwhile the firm helps process health and auto medical-payment benefits at no charge, which is usually the part quietly bleeding money while everyone waits.
Every offer is passed to you as it arrives, with a straight assessment of whether it is fair and reasonable. Nothing settles without your permission. If the number will not move, the file gets prepared for trial rather than argued about indefinitely.
There is no correct interval and nobody here will hurry you. What is worth knowing is that evidence about how a death happened is at its most recoverable early, and that an initial conversation is not the same as a decision to proceed.
Indiana sets one, and a wrongful death claim filed after it has run cannot be honoured - the opportunity to recover for the family is gone permanently. That is precisely why no figure is printed here: the one that applies depends on the circumstances and the defendant. Ask early.
No. A criminal prosecution and a civil claim are separate proceedings with different purposes and different standards of proof, and they routinely run alongside one another.
It depends which of the three claim types applies and who the surviving family are. Spouses and children are frequently the primary beneficiaries, with parents recovering in defined circumstances. A personal representative usually files, which is a role rather than an entitlement to the recovery.
Most people who call this office would say exactly the same. The question worth separating out is whether the people left behind can manage what has been taken from them, which is a different question to how anyone feels about litigation.
Personal injury is not one of the things this firm does. Since 1974 it has been the only thing it does, which means nobody here is fitting your claim in between a house closing and a divorce.
Collisions are the most common reason people call this office, and the ones involving trucks, tractor-trailers or motorcycles are the ones most likely to leave something permanent behind.
These are the cases where the settlement has to be right the first time, because the consequences keep arriving for decades after the file closes.
The rest of the practice is on the practice areas index. If you would rather not take any of this on description alone, the admissions and memberships are all checkable against their sources, and the questions people actually ask cover the process before you speak to anyone.
The first conversation is free and puts you under no obligation. Bring the report, the photographs, the letter from the insurer, or nothing at all.
Contacting Cooke Law Firm or Cooke Law Firm does not create an attorney-client relationship, and nothing on this site is legal advice. Please do not send confidential information until a written engagement is in place. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.